Articles, News

FTC tears into Apple, Google over kids’ privacy – or lack of

Comments Off 20 February 2012

The FTC has notified Apple & Google that they actually need to read, abide by and enforce their own privacy policies.  Specifically, these two operators can’t turn a blind-eye to what data the cell-phone application developers collect, and what they do with that data.

 

 

From The Register:

FTC tears into Apple, Google over kids’ privacy – or lack of

‘Impossible’ to know data collected by apps, watchdog fumes

By Brid-Aine Parnell

 

US regulators have told smartphone software makers to do more to protect the privacy of kids using their apps – or face the watchdogs’ wrath.

In a report that acknowledged the “tremendous” growth of mobile software, the Federal Trade Commission said app developers are not making “simple and short” declarations of their privacy policies. As a result, young users – picked out for their vulnerability – could be giving up their mobile phone numbers, contacts, location and other data without knowing about it.

It also warned that app stores run by Apple and Google needed to do more.

“Although the app store developer agreements require developers to disclose the information their apps collect, the app stores do not appear to enforce these requirements. This lack of enforcement provides little incentive to app developers to provide such disclosures and leaves parents without the information they need,” notes the report.

“As gatekeepers of the app marketplace, the app stores should do more.”

via FTC tears into Apple, Google over kids’ privacy – or lack of • The Register.

Articles, News

Google Caught Tracking Safari Users – What You Need to Know

Comments Off 20 February 2012

Don’t be evil.  That’s Google’s job.

 

In contravention of Apple’s policies, and their own statements about consumer privacy, Google bypassed Safari’s security settings to store permanent cookies on Apple devices.

 

From Mashable.com:

Google Caught Tracking Safari Users: What You Need to Know

Google is in a lot of hot water over recent revelations about how it tracks user activity on Apple devices — particularly iPhones and iPads.

As reported by The Wall Street Journal, an independent researcher has discovered that Google embeds hidden software on many websites — software designed to circumvent the default settings on a web browser to record a user’s behavior.

via Google Caught Tracking Safari Users: What You Need to Know.

Articles, News

Feds Want to Warrantlessly Track Phones Bought with Fake Names

Comments Off 20 February 2012

In US vs Warshak, the DOJ argued in court that since email accounts are hacked into, people die, and people forget their passwords, email should have no 4th amendment protections.

By this logic, NO HOUSE or APARTMENT in the US is safe.  Houses get broken into, people lose house keys, and some people die alone. (no wills, no heirs)

 

The FBI applied similar logic when attaching GPS trackers, without warrants, to college student’s vehicles in the US.

 

Now, if you buy a phone with a fake name, or rent an apartment under a fake name, they argue you’ve forfeited your 4th Amemdment rights.

 

From Gizmodi & Wall Street Journal:

Feds Want to Warrantlessly Track Phones Bought with Fake Names

If the DOJ gets its way, it won’t need a warrant to monitor people who buy cell phones and other electronic services using a fake name, according to a story in today’s Wall Street Journal.

The DOJ is arguing that because a California man used a fake name when he bought a broadband card, service and a computer (and rented his apartment) he’s not entitled to protection under the fourth amendment.

The government used a device called a Stingray to locate the broadband card being used by Daniel David Rigmaiden. The Stingray mimics a cell phone tower, and pings the target device. It measures the signal strength, and then moves to another location and measures it again. It uses that data to triangulate the phone’s position. They are increasingly being used by law enforcement.

The FBI didn’t get a warrant when it used a Stingray to locate Rigmaiden’s location. At his apartment complex, it found he had used a fake ID on his rental application. It used that to get a search warrant, where it found the broadband card.

The government’s argument is that it didn’t need a warrant to locate Rigmaiden because he gave up his fourth ammendment rights and had no reasonable expectation of privacy when he used a fake name to rent and purchase his broadband card, service and computer.

It’s in the courts, but if the DOJ wins this one, it could mean that even if you use a fake name to buy something in a non-fraudulent matter—say a burner phone—it can track you down, and perhaps even listen in. Beware, Stringer Bell.

via Feds Want to Warrantlessly Track Phones Bought with Fake Names.

Articles, News

Germany’s intelligence services Ignore current neo-nazi threats, focus on elected Officials

Comments Off 20 February 2012

According to the Economist, the German Federal & State intelligence services are stuck in the past.

 

Rather that focusing on current threats, like a neo-naze group that murdered 10 people, they have been focused on spying on former East German radicals…including those that have been democratically elected, and hold political offices.

 

We saw this in the US in the 1950s-1970s, where the government spied on it’s political rivals, not actual threats.

 

This is the biggest long-term threat to privacy from Social Media, Cloud Computing and ubiquitous surveillance.

Like roach motels, once your data checks in, it never checks out. 

Once you’ve been tagged as a threat / problem / terrorist or rabble rouser, the cops, governments and databases will treat you as such for life.

The Occupy Wall Street protestors were the most heavily photographed and video demonstration in the US.  You can bet their names, photos, addresses are in hundreds of threat databases.

 

From The Economist:

Protection racket

The spooks can’t keep their eyes off the left

Feb 4th 2012 | BERLIN | from the print edition

GERMANY’S intelligence services failed to detect a gang of neo-Nazis who murdered ten people over several years. Never mind. They have a vice-president of the Bundestag in their sights.

Times are awkward for the 17 Offices for the Protection of the Constitution, as the domestic intelligence agencies are known (one at federal level and one for each of the 16 states). The “Zwickau cell” killed with impunity until two of its members shot themselves in November after fleeing a bank robbery. Perhaps that is because the spooks were busy watching the Left Party, the fourth-largest in the Bundestag. The federal office is monitoring 27 of its deputies, including Petra Pau (a Bundestag vice-president) and a member of the committee that oversees the intelligence services. The party, or affiliated groups, are also targets in most states. This constitutes “defamation of the opposition”, complained Jan Korte, a legislator on the watch list.

There are reasons to keep an eye on the Left Party. It is the direct descendant of East Germany’s communists and expanded westward by attracting disgruntled Social Democrats. Although the party espouses “democratic socialism” it harbours some groups that seem unsure about democracy. It has seats in 13 state legislatures and has helped govern, mostly pragmatically, three eastern states. The federal agency has been watching it since 1995.

via Germany’s intelligence services: Protection racket | The Economist.

News

Aussie Police spy on web, phone usage with no warrants

Comments Off 20 February 2012

George Orwell was such an optimist

 

The Australian police have been spying on web surfing, emails, cell phones with warrants for quite some time.

 

At least they’re in good company…along with the US, Canada, UK, Syria, Iran, China, Russia, etc.

 

From TheAge.com.au:

 

Police spy on web, phone usage with no warrants

Philip Dorling

February 18, 2012

Scott Ludlam.

Scott Ludlam, Greens senator … “We’ve already taken some pretty dangerous steps … towards the surveillance state.”

 

LAW enforcement and government departments are accessing vast quantities of phone and internet usage data without warrants, prompting warnings from the Greens of a growing ”surveillance state” and calls by privacy groups for tighter controls.

Figures released by the federal Attorney-General’s Department show that federal and state government agencies accessed telecommunications data and internet logs more than 250,000 times during criminal and revenue investigations in 2010-11.

The Greens senator Scott Ludlam highlighted the statistics while calling for tighter controls on access to mobile device location information.

Advertisement: Story continues below

”There should be a higher standard of proof, or a higher standard of cause needing to be shown, to track down your every location through your life than there is for reading your email,” he said at a recent conference on internet privacy.

via Police spy on web, phone usage with no warrants.

Articles, News

The Minority Report is Here

Comments Off 17 February 2012

Do you recall how in The Minority Report, stores were trying to sell Tom Cruise products based on his retina scans?

What would you do if a Retailer knew you were pregnant, and when the due date was before you told your friends and family?

Or they figured out whether you got a bonus or were unemployed without you telling them?

This article in Forbes on Target’s Pregnancy Identifier database is eerily unsettling. Especially the way they created the “random coupons” baby book.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/kashmirhill/2012/02/16/how-target-figured-out-a-teen-girl-was-pregnant-before-her-father-did/

Continue Reading

News

Over 3 years later, “deleted” Facebook photos are still online

Comments Off 06 February 2012

So, Facebook has IPO’d and  Zuckerberg is a multi-billionaire.  His dad is worth over $ 60,000,000.

Several million people have been born.

OSX has updated…twice.

UK and Australia have ruled that nothing on Facebook is private.

And Facebook still can’t figure out how to delete files properly…3 years later.

 

FROM ARS TECHNICA:

Over 3 years later, “deleted” Facebook photos are still online

By Jacqui Cheng

Over 3 years later, “deleted” Facebook photos are still online

Some photos just don’t need to see the light of the next day.

Facebook is still working on deleting photos from its servers in a timely manner nearly three years after Ars first brought attention to the topic. The company admitted on Friday that its older systems for storing uploaded content “did not always delete images from content delivery networks in a reasonable period of time even though they were immediately removed from the site,” but said it’s currently finishing up a newer system that makes the process much quicker. In the meantime, photos that users thought they “deleted” from the social network months or even years ago remain accessible via direct link.

The problem: “deleted” photos never go away

When we first investigated this phenomenon in 2009, we discovered that photos “deleted” from Facebook seemingly never go away if you have a direct link to the image file on Facebook’s servers. Users who might have had second thoughts about posting a photo—whether it was because they didn’t want retaliation from an employer, wanted to avoid family drama, or uploaded a photo of a friend without their permission—could certainly remove the image from Facebook’s main user interface, but as long as someone had a direct link to the .jpg file in question, the photo would remain accessible for an indefinite amount of time. When we asked Facebook about it, we were told that the company was “working with our content delivery network (CDN) partner to significantly reduce the amount of time that backup copies persist.”

via Over 3 years later, “deleted” Facebook photos are still online.

Articles, News

“Everything You Say Can And Will Be Used Against You, By Anybody, Now Or Decades Into The Future.” – Falkvinge on Infopolicy

Comments Off 02 January 2012

“Everything You Say Can And Will Be Used Against You, By Anybody, Now Or Decades Into The Future.”

Arrest

Freedom of Speech

There are politicians trying to eliminate anonymity on the net. That’s a very, very dangerous game to play. Beside the fact that it will always be easily circumvented when people know they need to be anonymous, the danger lies in when people don’t think of that need.

Every day, we say things that we wouldn’t say in other contexts. We react to news with WTF-type blurts, we react to stupid politicians and greedy bankers with emotional statements.

via “Everything You Say Can And Will Be Used Against You, By Anybody, Now Or Decades Into The Future.” – Falkvinge on Infopolicy.

Articles, News

This Is Data Retention. Would You Give It To Any Future Government? – Falkvinge on Infopolicy

Comments Off 02 January 2012

This Is Data Retention.

http://falkvinge.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/CrowdFlow-646x363.jpg

Would You Give It To Any Future Government?

A new visualization of cellphone location data surfaced on Engadget. While it was hailed as a cool visualization of location, it is something more: it is an insight into the powers taken by European governments by means of the Data Retention Directive.Would you want the Police to be able to see your movements and the movements of all of your friends like this? Would you want the Police under any future government and set of laws to be able to track and correlate how you and your friends move, in real time and in recorded history, like this?

 

Many people dismiss Data Retention with the “I have nothing to hide” shrug. That is dangerous, careless and ignorant of everything history has to teach us. If the former East European governments had had this kind of visualization on their dissidents, they would still be around. The governments, that is, not necessarily the dissidents.

via This Is Data Retention. Would You Give It To Any Future Government? – Falkvinge on Infopolicy.

News

How Facebook Can Hurt Your Credit Rating

Comments Off 20 December 2011

How Facebook Can Hurt Your Credit Rating

Analysis: Bank on it — Financial institutions are checking social media profiles to identify credit risks. It’s time to ditch those deadbeat friends.

By Dan Tynan, ITworld Dec 18, 2011 10:36 am

You know those deadbeat friends of yours on Facebook? They could end up killing your credit score and costing you a loan. At the very least, your no-account pals could bump up your interest rate.

A chilling story in the New York Observer’ BetaBeat blog this week details the efforts of several online banks that plan to analyze your social media profiles to determine how big a credit risk you are. It’s yet more evidence that, unlike Las Vegas, what happens on Facebook doesn’t stay on Facebook – and could come back to bite you in unexpected and unpleasant ways.

How are banks going to use this information? First, they’re going to use your friends list to troll for future prospects. If you just took out a line of credit against the equity in your house, maybe your friends will too – assuming they’ve got any equity left.

It gets worse. Let’s say you fall a few months behind on your payments and you’ve decided to banish the bill collecting goons to voice mail. Hong Kong-based micro-lender Lenddo – which asks for your Facebook, Twitter, Gmail, Yahoo, and Windows Live logons when you sign up — reserves the right to rat you out to all your friends

 

via How Facebook Can Hurt Your Credit Rating | PCWorld.

Articles, News

ACMA finds Facebook photos are not private

Comments Off 20 December 2011

ACMA finds Facebook photos are not private

By Brett Winterford on Dec 19, 2011 1:56 PM

Users offered no safety from Facebook-trawling.

Australia’s communications regulator has ruled that television networks are not breaking the industry’s code of practice when publishing photos lifted from a public Facebook profile.

 

The Australian Communications and Media Authority ACMA determined that Channel Seven did not breach the Commercial Television Industry Code of Practice when it accessed and broadcasted photographs – specifically in the case of a deceased person lifted from a Facebook tribute page, and another which broadcasted the name, photograph and comments penned by a 14-year old boy.

via ACMA finds Facebook photos are not private – Security – Technology – News – iTnews.com.au.

Articles, News

FBI says Carrier IQ files used for “law enforcement purposes”

Comments Off 12 December 2011

FBI says Carrier IQ files used for “law enforcement purposes”

By Rob Beschizza at 12:42 pm Monday, Dec 12

The FBI disclosed this weekend that it uses data gathered by Carrier IQ software for “law enforcement purposes”, but refused to give any details of exactly how it has done so.

Responding to a Freedom of Information Act request filed by Muckrock, the FBI said that it held relevant records but that their release could interfere with pending or prospective law enforcement proceedings.

via Boing Boing.

Articles, News

Assange vs. Zuckerberg

Comments Off 12 December 2011

Assange vs. Zuckerberg

 

 

 

via Assange vs. Zuckerberg – Imgur.

Articles, News

Ambulances turned away as computer virus infects Gwinnett Medical Center computers

Comments Off 12 December 2011

Ambulances turned away as computer virus infects Gwinnett Medical Center computers

By Misty Williams and Joel Anderson

The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

Gwinnett Medical Center on Friday confirmed it has instructed ambulances to take patients to other area hospitals when possible after discovering a system-wide computer virus that slowed patient registration and other operations at its campuses in Lawrenceville and Duluth.

Staff members discovered the virus Wednesday afternoon and have been working since then with outside I.T. experts to fix the problem, spokeswoman Beth Okun said. In the meantime, the health system has been forced to switch back to paperwork.

The situation is expected to last through the weekend, Okun said.

via Ambulances turned away as computer virus infects Gwinnett Medical Center computers  | ajc.com.

Articles, News

Firewall Law Could Infringe on Free Speech

Comments Off 12 December 2011

Stop the Great Firewall of America

By REBECCA MacKINNON

Published: November 15, 2011

 

China operates the world’s most elaborate and opaque system of Internet censorship. But Congress, under pressure to take action against the theft of intellectual property, is considering misguided legislation that would strengthen China’s Great Firewall and even bring major features of it to America.

The legislation — the Protect IP Act, which has been introduced in the Senate, and a House version known as the Stop Online Piracy Act — have an impressive array of well-financed backers, including the United States Chamber of Commerce, the Motion Picture Association of America, the American Federation of Musicians, the Directors Guild of America, the International Brotherhood of Teamsters and the Screen Actors Guild. The bills aim not to censor political or religious speech as China does, but to protect American intellectual property. Alarm at the infringement of creative works through the Internet is justifiable. The solutions offered by the legislation, however, threaten to inflict collateral damage on democratic discourse and dissent both at home and around the world.

The bills would empower the attorney general to create a blacklist of sites to be blocked by Internet service providers, search engines, payment providers and advertising networks, all without a court hearing or a trial. The House version goes further, allowing private companies to sue service providers for even briefly and unknowingly hosting content that infringes on copyright — a sharp change from current law, which protects the service providers from civil liability if they remove the problematic content immediately upon notification. The intention is not the same as China’s Great Firewall, a nationwide system of Web censorship, but the practical effect could be similar.

via Firewall Law Could Infringe on Free Speech – NYTimes.com.

Articles, News

Artists Sue CBS, CNET, for Promoting and Profiting from Piracy

Comments Off 12 December 2011

Artists Sue CBS, CNET, for Promoting and Profiting from Piracy

November 15, 2011

 

A coalition of artists has joined eccentric billionaire and FilmOn founder Alki David in a new class action lawsuit against CNET and CBS Interactive. The complaint filed at a federal court in Los Angeles claims that through websites like Download.com, these companies have willingly profited from popularizing online copyright infringements. The artists want the CBS chiefs to be held accountable for “soliciting such widespread theft.”

cnetEarlier this year Alki David and a handful of artists sued CBS Interactive and CNET for their role in distributing LimeWire and other P2P and DRM-cracking software.

In July the lawsuit was pulled, but David promised to come back later in the year with an even bigger case. That day has now arrived.

Together with the “Justice for Artists Coalition” which includes Dough E Fresh, H-Town, Slick Rick and Ron Brows, David has filed a new lawsuit at a federal court in Los Angeles. In common with their previous case, the coalition claims that CBS and CNET profited heavily from distributing and popularizing file-sharing software such as LimeWire.

“CBS Interactive has quietly made billions by inducing the public to break the law, by providing them the file-sharing software and step-by-step guides, on exactly how to do it. No one has held Defendant accountable for this. Until now,” the complaint reads.

via Artists Sue CBS, CNET, for Promoting and Profiting from Piracy | TorrentFreak.

Articles, News

Too much social media networking: Paranoia of Big Brother surveillance may destroy ya

Comments Off 12 December 2011

Too much social media networking: Paranoia of Big Brother surveillance may destroy ya

The biggest cybersecurity agency in Europe peeked at the future, 2014, to predict the effects of online social media connectivity 24/7 and concluded that too much social networking could make you paranoid and feel like you are constantly under surveillance by Big Brother.

By Ms. Smith on Wed, 11/16/11 – 12:34pm.

 

If you think 24/7 connectivity is nothing new for you, and you constantly check in on Foursquare, use location-aware apps, update Facebook or other social media statuses with your geo-tagged photos, then you probably have no location-awareness sharing issues and are not overly concerned if you lose locational privacy. In the year 2014, your futuristic automated smart home can update statuses for you; even more personal data will be logged coming from emerging technology; interaction with the power grid, smart meters, IP TVs, smart appliances, movie theaters harvesting emotions, robots, GPS in cars and smartphones, and products that stalk you will create a life-log. By 2014 there will be a plethora of programs, mobile apps and devices to track you that will create and store records of your movements, activities and behaviors; this is the scene that Europe’s biggest cybersecurity agency studied “to predict positive and negative effects of online ‘life-logging’ on citizens and society.”

In the European Network and Information Security Agency (ENISA) report, “To log or not to log? Risks and benefits of emerging life-logging technologies, the agency used a 2014 fictional family’s day-to-day lives and examined the “impact for their privacy and psychology as they put ever more personal information online.” While you might not call it life-logging, it’s not too farfetched as many people track personal data generated by their own behavioral activities.

via Privacy and Security Fanatic: Too much social media networking: Paranoia of Big Brother surveillance may destroy ya.

Articles, News

Fourth Amendment’s Future if Gov’t Uses Virtual Force and Trojan Horse Warrants?

Comments Off 12 December 2011

Fourth Amendment’s Future if Gov’t Uses Virtual Force and Trojan Horse Warrants?

An interesting paper discussed the future of the Fourth Amendment in the cyber world. Can the government legally deploy malware for eavesdropping and remote searches, in order to investigate and control potential criminal activity? This is part one of looking at Susan Brenner’s paper, Fourth Amendment Future: Remote Computer Searches and the Use of Virtual Force.

By Ms. Smith on Tue, 11/08/11 – 2:24pm.

 

It’s a huge day on the privacy front, where technology, privacy and the Constitution had a head-on collision, and now the Supreme Court is hearing arguments about and “seeing shades of 1984″ in warrantless GPS tracking. The future of the Fourth Amendment looks a bit bleak in this digital age, so I hope SCOTUS does the right thing for the USA. Along those lines of surveillance without a warrant, I read an interesting paper about the Fourth Amendment in the cyber world and the government deploying malware for eavesdropping in order to investigate and control potential criminal activity. It provoked some deep, unpleasant, and yet realistic thoughts about how much virtual force is done now via stealthy spying Trojans which are launched by law enforcement for remote computer searches.

Susan W. Brenner, of the University of Dayton School of Law, wrote: Fourth Amendment Future: Remote Computer Searches and the Use of Virtual Force. She divided her focus into two main topics. The abstract states, “The first is the use of certain types of software, most notably Trojan horse programs, to conduct surreptitious, remote searches of computers and computer media. The other tactic is the use of ‘virtual force,’ e.g., using Distributed Denial of Service and other attacks to shut down or otherwise disable websites that host offending content and/or activities.”

via Privacy and Security Fanatic: Fourth Amendment’s Future if Gov’t Uses Virtual Force and Trojan Horse Warrants?.

Articles, News

4th Amendment vs Virtual Force by Feds, Trojan Horse Warrants for Remote Searches?

Comments Off 12 December 2011

4th Amendment vs Virtual Force by Feds, Trojan Horse Warrants for Remote Searches?

Can the government legally deploy malware for eavesdropping and remote searches, in order to investigate and control potential criminal activity? Here’s a look at the future of the Fourth Amendment if the Feds lawfully use virtual force to remotely search computers and how such Trojan horse warrants would work.

By Ms. Smith on Wed, 11/09/11 – 7:57am.

 

If you missed part one, Fourth Amendment’s Future if Gov’t Uses Virtual Force and Trojan Horse Warrants, then please go catch up with the rest of us. This time we’ll look at Remote Access Trojans (RAT) which are nothing new, yet assume that this government-injected malware/spyware was not detected by antivirus. Also in this case, we are not assuming the target is a SE (social engineering) victim who opens an email or clicks on a link that installs the backdoor into their digital life. This isn’t about if I agree or if I think that sort of privacy invasion is right (if you are wondering, then you’ve never read this blog huh?); this is about an interesting paper that discussed if the government/law enforcement can legally get around your Fourth Amendment rights and secretly install software for remote searches.Virtual Force

When the Feds used virtual force to “enter” computers infected with the Coreflood botnet and issue the ‘stop’ command, thereby disabling the malware, it was not considered a Fourth Amendment search. It did not “meaningfully interfere with a computer owner’s possessory interests over an infected computer” and required no Trojan horse warrant. While it ended successfully, and we don’t need botnets, that seems like a very slippery slope now that we are talking about surreptitiously installing software so law enforcement can sneak in through a backdoor for a remote search.

via Privacy and Security Fanatic: 4th Amendment vs Virtual Force by Feds, Trojan Horse Warrants for Remote Searches?.

Articles, News

Facebook Wants to Issue Your IRL Offline ID & Internet Driver’s License

Comments Off 12 December 2011

Facebook Wants to Issue Your IRL Offline ID & Internet Driver’s License

At the start of this year, it seemed as if Facebook wanted to utilize its identity infrastructure already on millions of websites in order to issue your Internet driver’s license. Apparently that wasn’t aiming quite take-over-the-world high enough, since it now appears as if Facebook, via a trademark application, wants to issue your in-real-life offline identity cards as well.

By Ms. Smith on Mon, 10/17/11 – 1:23pm.

 

At the start of this year, it seemed as if Facebook wanted to utilize its identity infrastructure already on millions of websites in order to issue your Internet driver’s license. Apparently that wasn’t aiming quite high enough, since it now appears as if Facebook has future plans to issue your offline identity cards as well. Facebook filed for a trademark for “goods and services” to use Facebook on “cards, namely business cards and non-magnetically encoded identity cards” that could be read by NFC and RFID-enabled devices. If that didn’t make you shiver, then the new trademark application states, the “business card and identity card design services” and “printing services” would be for “facilitating social and business networking through the provision of data for use on business and identity cards.”

Like Google Plus, Facebook regards pseudonyms as a sin and wants to kill off anonymity. Many sites have cut back on comment spam, though, by requiring Facebook Connect which in turn requires a user’s real identity. Countless millions of websites have avoided the headaches and hassles of managing their own identity system by implementing the free and easy code for Facebook Connect to manage online identities. In fact, logging in, “liking” and sharing via Facebook has literally become a critical part of the Internet’s identity infrastructure.

via Privacy and Security Fanatic: Facebook Wants to Issue Your IRL Offline ID & Internet Driver’s License.

What to teach your kids about Social Media

Comments

Raj, thanks for your presentations Businger, Michael (Businger)

Quote Rotator

Loading Quotes...

© 2012 Raj Goel, CISSP. Powered by WordPress.

Daily Edition Theme by WooThemes - Premium WordPress Themes